ext_66847 ([identity profile] lynxgriffin.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] lynxgriffin 2006-05-28 11:40 pm (UTC)

Well, if you look at some of the other comments above, the picture was supposed to be older, 18+ versions of the characters, since I'm not one for drawing underage characters having sex, either. I could have perhaps put a note in the description saying they're supposed to be older, if it didn't come across in the actual picture, but I have no idea if that would've made a difference or not. Especially since I know an artist who had their work deleted that was of a similar nature: two characters having sex, but with nothing actually showing and behind a maturity cut, but it was very obvious that the characters were both adults.

And I'm not out to attack or insult anyone, I just needed to blow off steam. -_-;

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting